In a groundbreaking policy adjustment, the Government of India is poised to permit private sector participation in the conservation of protected monuments. This domain was previously dominated by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). This strategic move aims to alleviate capacity constraints and enhance efficiency while attracting CSR funding for heritage conservation, all under the vigilant oversight of the ASI.
The Ministry of Culture is currently empaneling private conservation architects and agencies through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process, which will close on January 12. Over 20 private heritage conservation agencies from across India have applied. After the empanelment, corporate donors who contribute via the National Culture Fund (NCF) will have the liberty to engage directly with their chosen conservation agencies. All conservation work will be conducted within frameworks set by the ASI and will be subject to its overall supervision.
The eligibility criteria for conservation architects include:
Donors will provide funds to the NCF under CSR provisions and will have the freedom to select empanelled conservation architects. Projects must adhere to Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) approved by ASI, follow timelines set by donors, and comply with established conservation norms. Execution will be managed by private agencies under the guidance of conservation architects and the supervision of ASI or relevant government entities.
The shift from the existing ASI model is primarily due to its monopoly and capacity constraints. The ASI currently oversees approximately 3,700 protected monuments, serving as the sole agency responsible for DPR preparation and conservation work execution. This has resulted in slow project implementation and delays in utilizing CSR funds.
The NCF, established in 1996 with an initial corpus of ₹20 crore, has received ₹140 crore in donations to date, funding around 100 conservation projects—70 of which are completed, while nearly 20 are ongoing. However, corporate donors have often faced challenges due to poor compliance timelines.
In contrast to previous initiatives such as the 'Adopt a Heritage' scheme, which allowed corporates to act as Monument Mitras with limited roles in tourist amenities, this new approach allows private donors to engage directly in core conservation work. The Ministry has identified 250 monuments requiring conservation, which donors can choose from or propose based on regional or thematic preferences.
Internationally, models such as the Churches Conservation Trust in the UK and private organizations in the US actively participate in heritage protection, demonstrating successful public-private partnerships (PPP) under strong state regulation. Germany and the Netherlands also showcase heritage foundations supported by private funding.
Despite the potential benefits, several challenges remain. There is a risk of commercializing heritage, necessitating transparent audits and periodic project reviews. Community and academic involvement alongside corporate entities will be essential for success. Additionally, clear conservation guidelines and standard operating procedures must be developed to ensure uniformity in conservation efforts.
Potential conflicts between donor preferences and archaeological integrity must be managed with robust monitoring mechanisms to prevent dilution of ASI’s authority. Capacity-building and certification of conservation professionals will also be crucial.
Opening monument conservation to the private sector signifies a paradigm shift in India’s heritage governance, transitioning towards a PPP-based model that enhances capacity. While the ASI maintains supervisory control, private participation is expected to expedite conservation efforts, improve fund utilization, and cultivate a national talent pool in heritage management. The ultimate success of this initiative will rely on stringent regulation and adherence to conservation ethics.
Q1. What are the key changes in India's monument conservation policy?
Answer: India's new policy allows private sector participation in monument conservation, enabling corporate donors to engage directly with conservation agencies, enhancing efficiency and funding.
Q2. Why is the ASI's current model seen as limited?
Answer: The ASI's monopoly over monument conservation has led to slow project implementation and delays in utilizing CSR funds, necessitating a shift towards private sector involvement.
Q3. How will private donors participate in conservation projects?
Answer: Private donors can select empanelled conservation architects and fund projects through the National Culture Fund, ensuring compliance with established conservation norms.
Q4. What are the eligibility criteria for conservation architects?
Answer: Conservation architects must have experience in restoring protected monuments and working with recognized agencies, ensuring they meet the standards set by the ASI.
Q5. What risks are associated with opening conservation to the private sector?
Answer: Risks include potential commercialization of heritage and conflicts between donor preferences and archaeological integrity, requiring strong regulatory measures to mitigate.
Kutos : AI Assistant!
